According to Wood (2004) since 20thcentury, sorting tv shows into categories or genres are becoming more complex, as there are “advent of hybridizations that cut across the categories into which programming is customarily divided.” Television are losing their rigidity and becoming increasingly confounded of its traditional culture form, as things that were separated began to mixed and changing. Usually television content got sorted into types, categories or genres, which were developed from film studies. The basic types of television modes are fact, fiction, entertainment and advertisement, however new analysis found that things have change, with hybridization. “Television’s generic system shows an increasing tendency towards hybridisation and reflexiveness” (Wood, 2004).
Reality tv are showing hybridity, which means that they are mixing of television types and styles that previously segregated the area of fiction and non-fiction. It become a problem of whether reality tv can still be though of as a genre when there is such high level of hybridity. Traditionally, non-fiction and fact are about reality with referential detail such as News, while fiction is about the imaginative world such as the fantasy novels and films Harry Potter. However, many reality tv shows use elements of fiction in the reality or non-fiction and fact mode, mixing and blurring the different of fiction and none-fiction modes.
Example of hybridity in reality tv shows are Game documentary tv show ‘Survivor’, a game show where ordinary people being put into unreal situation, forcing to cope without the modern comforts. Because of the lack of real driven narrative, the show introduced the idea of voting the contestant of the show. Another example is Docudrama, ‘Cathy Come Home’ (1996), a scripted show but were represented in a way that appears like real life event. It was successful and effective although it was scripted and not reality.
According to Wood (2004) Dauncey (1996) believe that the mid 1990s reality tv programmes, specifically the French reality tv shows,“had become ‘increasingly resistant to a cataloguing based on programme format’.” He suggests dividing reality tv genre into the everyday dramas, include courage, talk about feelings and civic action. However, Wood argues that there is problem with this, as Dauncey’s thematic unities does not really differentiate hybridized reality from other types of TV content. The analysis through genre and thematic fail to differentiate hybridized as they only succeed in normalizing the hybrid, they did not consider the categorical crossing which defines the hybrid content.
More studies are needed in order to distinct types of reality TV and the hybridity, it is impossible to do this by just looking only at the show itself. The understanding of where the shows are from, the reason it was produced and the certain way it is being represent, are needed.
References:
Wood, B. (2004) A world in Retreat: The Reconfiguration of Hybridity in 20th-Century New Zealand Television. Media Culture Society. http://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704039709