As I mentioned in previous blog Reality television has a wide range of areas which I cover from the competition today in the live shows. What I will be discussing in this blog I whether reality tv can still be thought of as a genre given the high level of hybridity that exists.
To begin one must first define the genre of reality television. However, as mentioned in my previous blog the definition of reality television is vague. Philippa smith “the only thing they have in common are the so-called “real people” doing real things. Rather than fictional people doing made-up stuff,” (Smith, 2020) at the same time Richard Kilborn’s definition of reality television “primary aim” was to showcase the shared experience or lived reality (Kilborn, 1994). If we focus on these definitions, then one can see very clear examples of this in the early years of reality television with shows like the early ’90s show real-world first few seasons. It followed regular people from different walks of life who moved into a house together and just lived their lives (Bunim, & Murray,1992) and in 1993 -1994 the series followed cast member Pedro Zamora an activist who opened up about his battle with HIV(Bunim, & Murray,1993). Zamora was a real person battling with a real disease, this was at the time the aids crisis was devastating America, having a person battling HIV and battling aids was something very educational as aids wasn’t a subject broached, the previous president of the US had slowly assisted in a time when fast action could save lives (Stack, 2018). So having an opening out a member of the LGBTQ community live his life allowed opportunity for education as well as providing empathy as it placed a face to the devastating crisis. Meaning it met the definition of Kilborn and Smith.
But as the years went by Reality television just as Philippa stated in the week 12 lecture “cannibalizing itself in order to survive” (Smith, 2020) and real word slowly lost its authenticity the later seasons being more criticised (Smith, 2020). Resulting in the almost spin-off show the challenge (Bunim, & Murray, 1998). An MTV series that would take cast members from other MTV series Like the real world. Something showing the cannibalization of reality television is the fact that many of the original members of the real world would then appear in the challenge series cast members to the point that the series second season title of the show title was Real World/ Road Rules where MTV stars from those two shows faced off against each other (Bunim, & Murray, 1999) a complete example of hybridization. Blitvich and Lorenzo- Dus made a good point when they stated that “it started out as a genre, but it has certainly evolved into a discourse,” because of the differences between the shows catagorized under the genre reality television (Blitvich., & Lorenzo-Dus, 2013). It is reasonable to agree with this as while the real world began with the idea of people from varying background gathering together while living their semi-normal lives the challenge is a completely different environment far removed from the show that wanted to look at human interaction as contestants have admitted to being isolated from the real world and instead are in a compact space every couple of months with the same people, as often they rotate who participates in the season rather than introducing a new cast, with no real outside contact (Regalado, 2018). This isolating experience based around the idea of battling people you know for money is so different from the real world where quite a few of the cast members originated from. This difference provides an argument against the idea of reality television being a genre.
Yet at the very same time, a person can say the exact opposite. Because despite being so far apart in content each almost standing at opposites of its content is still very much adheres to the description of reality television. Both shows are different and yet both show real people doing real things most, both have a sense of relatability, the real world through the showing of humans awkwardly trying to live with strangers and the challenges this brings while the challenge depicts the struggles one goes through when trying to achieve the same goal.
It’s because of these points I find myself agreeing that reality television is vast with so much content to the point where cannibalization of content occurs resulting in programs that resemble little of what the origins were. However, I feel the core of reality television programs has not changed therefore it can still be a genuine genre.
Reference
Blitvich, P., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2013). Real Talk – Reality television and Discourse Analysis in Action. Basingstoke, UK; Palgrave Macmillan.
Bunim, M- E (creat), Murray, J (creat). (1999). Real-world/ road rules challenge [television]. The Challenge. United States: MTV
Bunim, M- E (creat), Murray, J (creat). (1992). Real world [Television]. United States: MTV
Bunim, M- E (creat), Murray, J (creat). (1993). Real-world: San Francisco [Television]. The Real World. United States: MTV
Regalado, M. (2018). 13 surprising things you never knew about myv’s ‘the challenge’ [Television]. retieved from https://www.insider.com/the-challenge-mtv-facts-2018-10
Smith, P (lec). (2020). Reality television part 2 [Lecture PowerPoint]. Retrieved from
Smith, P (lec). (2020). Reality television part 2 [Lecture recording]. Retrieved from
Stack, L. (2018). ‘He did not lead on aids’: with bush, activists see a mixed legacy. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/03/us/george-bush-hiv-aids.html