Week 2 Questions

In what specific ways is Tintin a forerunner of late 20th – 21st century transmedia storytelling franchises?  

In Mountfort’s (2016) review, it is said that Tintin has been recalled as one of the greatest global transmedia franchises of the early twenty-first century and quickly gained popularity in popular culture through its dependence on its spread over different medias. From its first success in the magazine Le Vingtième Siècle (The Twentieth Century) as a strip cartoonTintin then got published into an album a year later in the same newspaper. This spurred Tintin from being a simple strip cartoon to a more novelistic form of media. This also influenced Hergé to create more fully plotted stories for Tintin which in turn made it easier to be commodified and more appealing to the public audience. Tintin also presented new aesthetics in its medium as Tintin’s first colorized debut, The Shooting Star was published. Colorization during this period of printmaking made the product a more “premium” product and elevated its appeal for the market as it cost more to produce. This marked a big transition for Tintin, from being a strip cartoon to a finished comic book. Tintin also easily became a brand that was merchandised across puzzles, calendars, cushions, etc, further increasing its spread over different mediums. 

Moreover, Tintin was published in many different forms of media such as albums, and feature film adaptations. Tintin had rapidly gained popularity and dominated the popular culture in Europe and is seen as one of the forerunners of late 20th-21st century transmedia franchises from its beginnings as a simple strip cartoon to fully fleshed out comic books. Tintin’s influence on popular culture encouraged its transmediation as Tintin became published in a range of narratives of film, comics, and more.  

References 

Mountfort, P. (2016). Tintin as Spectacle: The Backstory of a Popular Franchise and Late Capital. Journal of Asia-Pacific Pop Culture, 1(1). 

Week 1 Questions

  1. How has the academic reception of popular genres changed over time? 

Over time, popular genres have been typically excluded from literary canon, and were often overshadowed and seen as inferior to other types of literature such as poetry and other classical genres. Popular genres were not considered a serious form of literature which mostly resulted in their exclusion, however, through the years, many literature programmes included pop genres into their curriculums, and some even have their own designated academic papers. Some of these papers have aims to analyse the theories of the literary genre through various mediums of media such as, novels, stories, film, comics, etc. Some papers also examine different genres of fiction and the importance of popular genres in relation to understanding contemporary life, values, and meanings. The stereotypes of popular genres that used to limit them from being considered a serious genre are now becoming a study of their own, such as their formulaic plot structures, their multi-modal way of production, technological development, etc.  

  1. What might the value be of studying them? 

Studying popular genres is valuable as they often include a range of diverse ideas and stories through a range of mediums like books, films, comics, etc. Popular genres has been and still sometimes is considered a form of lowbrow literature, but often holds carefully crafted pieces of media from different times and places which, can be valuable to critique in the present day. It is also valuable in the way that popular genre may include interesting aspects and qualities that more traditional and ‘high’ literature lacks. Often popular genre can distort realism through creating imaginary worlds and themes which can present new ideas.