Can reality tv still be thought of as a genre given the high level of hybridity that exists?
Wood (2004) discovers the significantly increased confounding in contemporary cultures of the reality tv programme. More specifically, contemporary tv programme contains many cross-categories contents compared with its former forms and cultures, what was not allowed to combine is now allowed to unite and verse-visa (Wood, 2004). Thus, scholars start discussing whether need to identified contemporary tv programme as a new form of genre or sub-genre. To begin, define the various genres that have been applied in reality programme is an essential procedure due to the reality programme is intertextual construction (Wood, 2004). According to Wood (2004), the television programme can be divided into four conventional modes: Fact, fiction, entertainment and advertisement. Fact programme features factual televisions, “…documentaries, news, current affairs practical advice shows and religious broadcasts” (Wood, 2004. p. 47), for example. Fiction programme features “drama, feature film and some forms of comedy.” (Wood, 2004. p. 47). Entertainment programme features “game shows, musical acts, talk shows, variety programmes, broadcast sport and some forms of comedy.” and advertisement features to market products (Wood, 2004. p. 47).
This type of programme evolved with changes and feedback from its audiences. When the reality tv programme emerged in New Zealand, most of the feedback was negative to criticize that the programme was cheap and superficial. However, it has become the top programme in New Zealand and even represents more forms, talent shows, dating shows and cooking shows, for example (Hill, 2005). Thus, it is difficult to divide reality tv programme from the aforementioned elements due to the necessity of blending in reality programme. From my perspective, this type of programme is the “melting pot” of different genres and cultures due to it contains comprehensive contents from citizens’ daily life and changes in humans’ society. Thus, it is certainly a high level of hybridity. However, Wood (2004. p. 58) asserts that “A portmanteau term encompassing diverse types of programming, reality TV has proved difficult to define.”. Hence, the specific ideology and concept may not be able to describe and create.
References
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Blitvich, P. (2013). Real Talk – Reality television and Discourse Analysis in Action. Basingstoke, UK; Palgrave Macmillan.
Wood, B. (2004) A World in Retreat: The Reconfiguration of Hybridity in 20th-Century New Zealand Television. Media, Culture & Society, 26(1), 45-62. doi:10.1177/0163443704039709