Week 12 response – Leo Ballantyne

  1. Can reality tv still be thought of as a genre given the high level of hybridity that exists?

According to Wood (2004) defining reality television as a genre is relatively unhelpful in a critical context due to the inherent tendency of all media content to attempt to “produce worldliness” and a “sense of real”. Especially in an age of increasing hybridity where televised media embrace both elements of the real and fictional, Wood suggests that this categorization is too reductive for the interplay that occurs between the various media types. Smith (2013) presents a similar sentiment, claiming that generalised criticisms of the genre ignore the vast variance that exists in both type and quality, which act to fill the needs of many different audience demographics. Wood communicates this notion of diversity and complexity by first identifying four traditional modes of television. This both showcases the pre-existing interplay between reality and fiction that exists in all television, as well as establish a typology which can better identify hybrid types which have developed out of these initial modes. Wood then outlines four major hybrid hinges which feature interplay and layering of these previously described modes, supporting his claim that the complexity and range of these interactions makes categorizing reality television as a genre relatively obsolete.

The four television modes Wood (2004) identifies are that of Fact, Fiction, Entertainment and Advertisement, all of which feature different methods to construct a reality. Fact refers to programming which claims to cover objective truths regarding the world outside the text. This mode is dominated by News Journalism and documentaries, however practical advice and smaller genres also operate within this category. Fiction, while making no attempt to faithfully replicate the external world, constructs a form of internalised world and attempts to assure the audience of this internal world’s reality. This mode encompasses film and television fiction. Entertainment is a mode of television where characters who exist both in the text and the external world are depicted, where they are expected to act as themselves while participating in various forms of spectacle. These characters being an extension of their external personas informs an implicit link between text and reality, and this feature is most common in genres such as Game shows, talk shows and sport, among others. Finally, Advertisements refer to commodities that exist, with advertisers using fictional/narrative elements to construct products as artificially desirable for the sake of increased sales. While advertising is usually a form unto itself, it can also appear within other genres such as via product placement within fictional television and film. Already, through this typography, Wood (2004) showcases the vast diversity that exists within reality television, already problematizing the use of reality tv as a genre. Problematizing this issue further is the forms of hybridity which have started manifesting themselves between these modes, which both increases the pre-existing diversity within the ‘genre’ and blurs lines between the fictitious and real.

Four major hinges or methods by which these previously stated modes are combined are Re-enactment, Diversion, Absorption and Infomercial. These all vary based on the modes that intermingle and how this remixing is achieved. Re-enactment is described as the reconstruction of real or external events using fictional techniques. Here the boundaries between reality and fiction are blurred due to the text’s preferentiality to the external world beyond the text, in contrast with the fundamental construction of the text as a work of fiction. Wood (2004) suggests that re-enactments often come with an implicit understanding that creative liberties have been taken in service of the narrative, demonstrating that this hinge is a less manipulative version of the hybridisation between fiction and fact. Diversion is a hybridization of Entertainment and fact, where people who are supposedly genuinely themselves – operating outside of designed spectacle – are depicted in generally mundane settings. Spectacle can occur in diversion, but it isn’t the intended purpose of the text to facilitate or cause this spectacle. Common versions of Diversion are blooper reels, behind-the-scenes documentaries or home video compilations. Diversion is a text type which emphases the mundane in the extraordinary and emphasises the extraordinary in the Mundane. As Langer (1998) suggests, there is a dimension of fictionality in such texts as well, where choices are made to artificially heighten this desired sense of mundane or extraordinary, and acting to characterise how both of these qualities are defined in society. Far more common in recent years is the two latter hybrid hinges of Absorption and Infomercial. In Absorption, vérité scenes and information are unpacked and recontextualised via a multitude of smaller dramatic recreations, editing techniques and the additions of a commentator. This is commonplace in certain subgenres of reality TV such as crime or medical shows, in game shows as well as more partisan news or infotainment organisations. Although the core material discussed by these texts are ostensibly real, the means in which such material is packaged can completely alter how the audience reads this information, and is capable of constructing very elaborate and contrived narratives from these readings, making Absorption sit at the crossroads of Fiction, fact and entertainment. Lastly, Infomercial is the practice of ‘program length commercials’, which are designed to sell a product through testimonials, re-enactments and demonstrations. Such texts are manipulative due to their layering of modes, namely fact and advertising, presenting themselves disingenuously as “quasi-news programmes or investigative consumer reports” in order to sell a product (Wood, 2004). As described, these hinges feature a complex interplay between various modes, especially that of fact, which can often be co-opted in order to smuggle in less verifiable truths or outright falsifications. The demonstrated hybridity that exists between these modes showcases a sophisticated relationship between reality television and many other forms of text where one cannot be as easily separated from the other.

By outlining the already complex primary modes of televisions, and then detailing how transgressions between these modes occur via hybrid hinges and their ability to obfuscate the boundaries between reality and fictional media, Wood (2004) underscores the fundamental impossibility of categorizing media using a binary which differentiates between real and artificial. This discussion compellingly conveys the increasing irrelevance of reality tv as a categorical tool and the need to develop a framework which better encompasses the diversity and complexity of television content.

Wood, B. (2004). A World in Retreat: The Reconfiguration of Hybridity in 20th-Century New Zealand Television. Media, Culture & Society, 45-62.

Smith, P. (2013). Heroic endeavours: flying high in New Zealand reality television. In N. Lorenzo-Dus, & P. Garces-Conejos Blitvich, Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action (pp. 140-165). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Langer, J. (1998). Tabloid Television. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203135211

Week 9: Cosplay

In what ways can cosphotography be understood as a form of “fan capital”? 

Cosphotography is a big part of cosplay as it captures cosplayers hard work and shows their cosplay costumes that cosplayers put in a lot of effort and time into through photography, this helps cosplayers be recognized on a larger scale. According to (Mountfort et al., 2019) Cosphotography helps cosplayers exchange their costume in an online network in the cosphere. This can be seen as a form of fan-capital as cosplayers are having their costumes recognized and the photographer who is capturing their costumes gets a subject to work with.

Cosphotography is a new concept just as new as cosplay because this concept is fairly new it come with modern day issues such as body-shaming. This creates a negative space for cosplayers as it discourages them from participating in conventions or they might feel embarrassed to walk out on the streets and show off their hard work.

Even though there is a negative side to cosphotography a lot there is still a lot of cosphotography that goes well recognized such as online platforms have specific galleries dedicated to cosplayers and their costumes even music videos to get cosplayers outfits recognized in a musical form. Another example is when Armageddon events happen a lot of people who aren’t even professional photographers hired to take cosplayers photos but do it purely out of getting them recognized which not only helps the cosplayers but also gets the event gain attention.

References:

Mountfort 2018, Planet Cosplay (Bristol, UK: Intellect Books), Intro and Chapter 1

Week 12 Questions – Reality Tv Pt.2

  1. Can reality tv still be thought of as a genre given the high level of hybridity that exists?

Over the long haul of things, especially in terms of television and its given, the class of reality  television has developed to incorporate various kinds and ideas through the concept of what is known to be hybridization. In theory, there is a wide range of all sorts and kinds of “unscripted” reality television programs around in the world we live in today. Such as for instance, programmes like game shows (who wants to be a millionaire), celebrity lifestyles (keeping up with the Kardashians), competitions and many more of this sort. Since there is such a huge assortment of the sorts of unscripted television shows, following the historical backdrop of the class of unscripted television and pinpointing it to a solitary purpose of birthplace can be of very troublesome nature. Also, in light of the fact that such a significant level of hybridity exists inside the domain of unscripted television, the inquiry emerges of whether we can even believe unscripted television to be its own kind, given that there are other endless types of these genres that merge together to make the entirety known as reality Tv. 

Although, while the class of reality television contains a plenitude of various kinds of configurations, these, overall, can be seen as being steel to one another. It doesn’t generally make a difference what kind of reality tv program one is watching. The shared characteristic between all these is that they are intended for giving amusement to the mass crowd in the end. The genre of reality tv often tends to “cannibalise” itself in order to have a means of survival (Hill, 2005). It is rather difficult to pinpoint exactly the sort of genre reality tv has evolved into as originally it had started out as an individual genre but as of present time it has adopted as well as adapted to various changes in terms of formats. Hill (2005) also talks about how television “draws upon existing genres to create successful hybrid programmes” which overall then lead into the concept of such new genres being created. He also further expresses that attempting to make an ideal thought of what the class of unscripted television really is and which other sub-sorts fit under its flag is a pointless exertion. We can’t compel the unscripted television sort to fit under one explicit, extraordinary genre. Such means of reality television is a kind in its own right, and keeping in mind that it genuine that it has absolutely changed and advanced throughout the long term, and that individual sorts of unscripted television programmes have jumped up from its branches, that doesn’t remove the title of such unscripted shows as its own mainstream class of reality TV.

Asides from Hill (2005) stressing that narrative TV has prompted business accomplishment by joining particular kinds of reality designs, and that the social explicitness of reality programming and the improvement of specific arrangements inside various telecom conditions. This shows up as a cross breed of unscripted television. It is stated by Wood (2004) “reality is not the preserve of one sort of programming. Rather, all media content produces worldliness and so can be typed according to the variety of ways in which it accomplishes this sense of the real”. Thus the principle components of TV such as themes and ideas of certainty, fiction, diversion, and promoting tend to then make reality in an assortment of ways. 

References

Wood, B. (2004) A World in Retreat The Reconfiguration o Hybridity in 20th Century New Zealand Television Media Culture and Society DOI: 10.1177/0163443704039709

Hill, A,. (2005) Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television, London, Routledge

Week 11: Reality TV

Reality TV is referring to television show or programs genre, shows that are unscripted, documenting real people in real situations, so not fictional and no professional actors.

According to Kilborn (1994) TV shows started to get group into this ‘Reality Programming’ genre in 1980s. No matter if its fictional shows or factual shows, television has become a lot more into notion of realist enterprise. The audience has also seemingly gain insatiable desired for ‘real life’ TV shows. Reality TV shows have a wide range of human activities, which are the basic elements of this genre, the main point of this is that the audience should be able to always relate to things that there are watching or seeing on screen. As this is the appeal of this genre, the sense that the things they are watching can happened to them or people whom are sitting at home watching the show. “Thus, those candid camera sequences featuring members of the public caught in compromising or embarrassing situation are popular with viewers” (Kilborn, 1994, p. 424). This not just because they find it funny but because they know have the sense that they could be perhaps become the next star of the show. Example of Reality TV shows are documentary, competition and survival shows, etc.

There are many types of different format, content or certain feature of the Reality TV shows, but they all has the same claims that their show are the authenticity real life situation and event. However, reality TV shows might not be as ‘REAL’ as they want the viewers and audience to believed. Sometimes viewers were deceived due to the techniques and the technologies the shows used, as traditional cinema and television makers set the way viewers perceive reality on screen.  Such as if the camera technique being used is ‘hand held’ or technologies being used is hidden camera, then can deceive viewers to presume what ever they are seeing on screen as real.

According to Parton (2018), reality TV shows that are not ‘real’ is ‘Matchmaker’ and ‘Love island’. ‘Matchmaker’ is a Canadian dating show, where people meet and go on blind date, and decide if they hit it off or not. Behind the scene. DomashnaRakija a Reddit website user claimed their cousin were on the show, they actually met with their soon to be ‘blind date’ before the camera began rolling, and producers tell them what they should do. Questions and answers which should be from the people on the show were not, it was scripted by the producers as well. ‘Love island’ is quite like ‘Survival’ show, but people were forced to couple up for romance, money and opportunity, even dialogue were scripted.

So, reality TV are not always about real people in real-life situations, as many shows are scripted and being manipulate by producers, to make sure their get the product that is what the audience want, even though they had to fake it.

References:

Kilborn, R. (1994). `How Real Can You Get?’: Recent Developments in `Reality’ Television. European Journal of Communication. http://doi.org/10.1177/0267323194009004003

Parton, J. (2018, February 16). 8 Fakest Reality Shows (And 8 That Are Totally Real). Screen Rant. https://screenrant.com/reality-tv-shows-fake-real/

Week 7:

King describes horror as being defined through three basic elements. Explain, using references, what these three elements are. Think of a horror story you’ve read/watched/heard that makes use of all three of these elements and show how King’s definition is at play in that narrative.

The three basic elements that define horror are said to be terror, horror and gag reflex by the famous author Stephen King. These elements can be seen in the 2019 film “In the Tall Grass” directed by  Vincenzo Natali based on the Stephen King and Joe Hill’s 2012 novella of the same name the film is a good example of how these three elements come into narrative.

Terror is the feeling of dread it is basically induced by the mind because the human mind fears the unknown. This can be seen in the film where “Becky” and her brother “Cal” panic because when they enter the field the grass randomly changes their course which leaves them in even more fear when they weren’t able to run back to the car because they weren’t able find their way back to the car. This when the terror kicks in when watching the film because the audience get to witness the actors expression of dread and fear of the unknown.

Secondly, Horror is something that humans cannot comprehend it is beyond the human imagination. This can be seen the film “In the Tall Grass” where “Becky” gets carried by the unknown grass entity who take her to the rock that has prophetic drawings on it which tells her the future about her pregnancy. This leaves not only “Becky” horrified by what is happening to her but also the audience because we aren’t able to comprehend what is going on and how its possible for a rock to tell “Becky’s” future.

Lastly, revulsion is when the audience is disgusted by the horror of certain aspects of the story having a story that can cause the audience to be disgusted has a greater impact on an audience when it is exhibited through a film because of the graphics that is produced so it helps the audience feel disgusted. We are shown this in the film where “Becky” stabs the chracther “Ross” although she was trying to escape from “Ross” who was going to attack her it still leaves the audience in disgust because of how visually grpahic the scene is.

References:

King, S. (1981). Danse Macabre.

In the Tall Grass (film). (2020, October 28). Retrieved September 26, 2020, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Tall_Grass_(film)

Week 12

Rija Faisal

Can reality tv still be thought of as a genre given the high level of hybridity that exists?

Over time, the genre of reality TV has evolved to include a number of different genres and concepts through hybridization.  There are many different types of reality TV programmes around these days ( competitions, celebrity lifestyle, game shows, to name a few),  and these programmes all take on different styles and various sorts of formats. Because there is such a vast variety of the types of reality TV shows, tracing the history of the genre of reality TV and pinpointing it to a single point of origin is quite difficult. And because such a high level of hybridity exists within the realm of reality TV, the question arises of whether or not we can even consider reality TV to be its own genre, given that so many genres blend together to create this one, single genre that we know as reality TV.  

It can indeed be difficult to say exactly what the genre of reality has evolved into. Though it started out as a genre of its own kind, it has developed into a discourse of debate. Nowadays, reality TV has adopted many different sorts of formats, revealing the rapid frequency with which it changes. This frequency with which reality TV changes, is, according to Hill (2005), “an example of how television cannibalizes itself in order to survive”. He states that this is how television “draws upon existing genres to create successful hybrid programmes”. Then, this, in turn, is what leads to an entirely new genre being created.

While the genre of reality TV comprises of an abundance of different types of formats, these, on the whole, can be viewed as being chain-linked to each other. It does not really matter what sort of a reality TV programme one is watching ( be it a dating show, a dance competition show, etc), the commonality between all these is that they are meant for providing entertainment to the mass audience.  

Hill (2005) further states that trying to create an ideal notion of what the genre of reality TV truly is and which other sub-genres fit under its banner is “a fruitless effort”. We cannot force the reality TV genre to fit under one specific, special category. Reality TV is a genre in its own right, and while it it true that it has certainly changed and evolved over the years, and that individual types of reality TV pogrammes have sprung up from its branches, that does not take away the title of reality TV as its own popular genre.

References

Wood, B. (2004) A World in Retreat The Reconfiguration o Hybridity in 20th Century New Zealand Television Media Culture and Society DOI: 10.1177/0163443704039709

Hill, A,. (2005) Reality TV: Audiences and Popular Factual Television, London, Routledge

Week 11 Questions – Reality Tv

  1. How real is reality Tv?

When it comes to the means of literal definition: the concept of reality shows can be defined as that it is basically a variable of unscripted programming that doesn’t utilize entertainers and spotlights on films of genuine functions or circumstances (“How reality TV works,” 2007). It is more or so assumed to be common knowledge that everybody knows and realises that the idea of reality tv is to a greater extent a classification than a precise portrayal of the shows themselves. Often many producers will counterfeit shots and even re-stage certain emotional scenes that happened when the camera’s weren’t rolling. Practically everything is really plotted and arranged like a typical scripted show (“8 Fakest reality shows (And 8 that are totally real),” 2018). Most unscripted TV dramas actually hold a fundamental degree of truth, nonetheless, portraying occasions of events that truly occurred, regardless of whether they’re organized and presentable enough, again for the cameras. These shows highlight individuals carrying on with their lives and managing their responsibilities, regardless of whether a ton has been streamlined of their everyday daily practice so as to alter out the exhausting or what could be considered as misplaced pieces.

Overall, more or so often these “reality” tv shows are incalculable that are effortlessly phony. For every even slightly “genuine” unscripted reality show there is always one that is evidently phony.These are those programs that are typically scripted in everything except for: name, utilizing selecting entertainers to play “genuine individuals” and manufacturing conditions and storylines around them. However that being said there are also then certain reality TV shows that are often too close to being the real deal. The concept behind these means of shows tend to basically leave the cameras running. Which then results into catching real moments of genuine means of dramatic encounters, events of risk, satire, and misfortune, regardless of whether they sporadically need to re-sanction certain parts so as to satisfy the makers and the organization (“8 Fakest reality shows (And 8 that are totally real),” 2018).

These shows often, likewise, regularly tend to utilize a host to manage everything or a narrator to recount the story or set the phase of functions that are going to “unfurl”. This genre of television doesn’t depend on scholars and entertainers, and a great part of the show is controlled by makers and a group of editors. Along these lines, it tends to be a truly reasonable programming choice from a creation stance. When it comes to the characterizing part of unscripted television it is most likely the way when and where it has initially actually been shot. Regardless of the small mere fact of whether or not the show happens in a genuine setting with genuine individuals much like per say a documentary shoots before a live studio crowd that partakes in the program, or uses concealed observation, reality television depends on the camera catching everything as it occurs (“How reality TV works,” 2007). 

References:

8 Fakest reality shows (And 8 that are totally real). (2018, February 16). ScreenRant. https://screenrant.com/reality-tv-shows-fake-real/

How reality TV works. (2007, December 7). HowStuffWorks. https://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/reality-tv.htm

Week 11

Rija Faisal

How real is reality TV?

By definition, reality TV is a genre of television programming that is unscripted and documents purportedly real-life situations, starring unknown individuals rather than professional and well-known actors.

The genre of reality TV has morphed from game shows and amateur talent competitions into a genre that now includes a wide variety of particular styles of TV programs. Now, reality TV encompasses unscripted dramas, makeover sagas, talent extravaganzas, lifestyle shows and celebrity behind-the-scenes exposes, dating shows and various competition shows.

Nowadays, on any given night, one can watch The Bachelor, Dancing With The Stars, Project Runway and America’s Next Top Model, to name just a few.  

Reality TV shows often involve the use of a host who runs the show or a narrator to tell the story to the audience, or to set the stage for the events that are going to unfold in the show. Unlike scripted shows such as sitcoms and dramas, reality TV does not rely on writers and actors, rather, the majority of the show is run by the producers and a team of editors.

The defining aspect of a reality TV show is the manner in which it is shot. It does not matter if the reality TV show takes place in a real setting involving real people, (in the manner of a documentary), if it is shot in a studio in front of a live audience or if it involves the use of hidden cameras, as reality TV relies on the camera capturing everything as it unfolds naturally. The camera is simply there to capture the spontaneous events as they happen.

So how real is reality TV? While the concept may vary from show to show, each concept is created by someone, usually the producer, the people starring in the show are either hired or land their role through an audition, and though the footage may bereal, it is, usually, heavily edited. Hours of footage are also shortened in order to fit into the restrictive time frame of a single episode. Some reality TV show contestants have claimed that their actions are often taken out of context and edited to be presented in misleading ways.

While reality TV shows typically do not have a script, often, though, they may have a shooting script or an outline detailing the aspects of an episode or a particular part of the show. These outlines might include directions for particular rooms or cameras to focus on, or they may set up a specific challenge that the contestants have to take part in, etc. A shooting script could also be used to create conflict between the participants (e.g, by pairing two people together as competitors for an episode, etc). Sometimes, a shooting script could also include a storyboard or a visual representation of the concept of a particular episode.     

Producers and editors of reality TV shows have a lot of control over what happens in the show. They put people together in certain situations, and they get to choose what footage gets aired and what gets cut, so it could be argued that reality TV shows are not as “real” as their name would suggest, as the producers and the editors are free to manipulate the show as they like.

Editors can also edit together excerpts and sound bits and pieces to create entirely new conversation or dialogue, creating a ‘false’ representation of reality. Alliances, fights, relationships, etc, can be created through editing, and footage that might have been captured over a period of days can come to appear as one single scene or situation.

So while reality TV does feature real-life people and portrays real-life events, it can be manipulated in ways that make it seem very ‘unreal’.

References

Winifred Fordham Metz, n.d. , how stuff works, How Reality TV Works, retrieved from: https://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/reality-tv.htm  

Week 6: Horror

What is the philosophy of cosmicism and how is it used to convey a sense of dread in both The Shadow Over Innsmouth and The Colour out of Space?

The philosophy of cosmicism was developed by H.P Lovecraft an American writer that naturalistic fusion of horror and science fiction which is known as ‘Lovecraftian Horror’. A common theme in Lovecrafts novels was fear of the unknown fear of species or an entity that is beyond our understanding as said my Lovecraft himself “The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown” this theme can be seen as comicism which is conveyed in Lovecrafts work such as, The Shadow Over Innsmouth and The Colour out of Space.

Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow Over Innsmouth’ has a supernatural entity which is called the ‘deep ones’ who are half human and fish hybrids that take control over the town as the inbreeds change fully into hybrids they lose their humanity while gaining immortality in the story they are described as repulsive. The cosmicism horror is shown through the protagonist Robert Olmstead who in the end turns about be a descendant of the ‘deep ones’ which leaves him in a state of shock which ultimately leads him to insanity because he fears of what will become of him. This theme of the unknown is repeated once again in Lovecrafts ‘The Colour out of Space’ where a meteorite crashes into a family’s garden the meteorite is from an exoplanet which is occupied tentacle entities the meteorite has an unknown energy beyond human understanding it mutates and kills anything that is around it. This classic weird horror themed story by Lovecraft shows that his stories were consistence with the theme of fear of the unknown.

Lovecrafts stories start of as uncertainty which quickly coverts into dreadful horror beyond humans capacity to comprehend as Slåtten (2016) writes in his article “idea of “cosmicism” which consists in the notion that humanity is utterly insignificant in and in relation to the cosmos-at large” Which shows, that cosmicism is used as dread in both The Shadow Over Innsmouth and The Colour out of Space and many other stories by H.P Lovecraft he used cosmicsim to simply reinforce the readers natural fear of the unknown because it is the oldest feeling that humans have. He uses it in his interest to create dread and horror in the readers minds which ultimately keeps them captured into his weird stories.

References:

Slåtten, K. Ø. (2016). Humans in a hostile cosmos: Science, cosmicism and race in HP Lovecraft’s Cthulhu mythos. Master’s thesis. University of Stavanger, Norway.

Jones, N. (2020). Lovecraftian Horror Video Lecture. Retrieved from AUT Blackboard.

Wikipedia. (n.d.). The shadow over innsmouth. Retrieved october 10, 2020, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shadow_over_Innsmouth

WEEK 10 SCIFI/ALT HISTORY

Week 10 SCIFI/ALT HISTORY  

What distinctions are there between alternate history, postmodern alternate history and uchronie genres? 

This is an over-simplification of the science behind parallel worlds. Fortunately, you don’t have to be a physicist studying the quantum level to understand that particles at the sub-atomic level can act as particles and waves (Clark, 2020). The two major schools of Interpretation of quantum physics is “The Copenhagen Interpretation” and “The Many Worlds Interpretation.” 

According to The Copenhagen Interpretation by Niels Bohr, all quantum particles exist in all its possible states at once and is called its wave function. The state of an object existing in all its possible states at once is called its superposition. Observation breaks an object’s superposition and essentially forces the object to choose one state from its wave function and give away its probable position. (Clark, 2020). 

The Many Worlds Interpretation by Hugh Everett agreed with Niels Bohr except when we measure a quantum object it does not force it into one comprehensible state or another instead it causes an actual split in the universe. The universe is literally duplicated, splitting into one universe for each possible outcome from the measurement and are totally separate from each other (Clark, 2020).  

Stories in an alternate history revolve around the basic premise that some event in the past did not occur as we know it did, and thus the present has changed. The alternate history as a genre speculates about such topics as the nature of time and linearity, the past link to the present, the present link to the future, and the role of individuals in the construction of history making. Alternate histories question the nature of history and causality; they question accepted notions of time and space; they rupture linear movement; and they make readers rethink their world and how it has become what it is. 

We experience time to run in one direction and history follows in terms of human affairs (Mountford, 2020). The alternate history, postmodern alternate history and uchronie is a subgenre of sci-fi, history or literary fiction that concerns itself with history’s turning out differently than what we know to be true – the what if? – scenario or Many World Interpretation.  Synchronic is concerned with change at a specific point in time in contrast to Diachronic which is change across time. 

Phillip K. Dicks The Man in the High Castle (1962) is a landmark example of the uchronie or alternate history genre (Mountford, 2020). Here Dick creates a world in which Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan have won World War II and these two superpowers carve up the world between themselves. The story is set in 1962, 15 years after Germany and Japan have won WWII, Dick explores what the Pacific West Coast of the United States would be like if occupied by the Japanese, the Atlantic East Coast by the Germans and the Rocky Mountain States in-between as a quasi-free neutral buffer zone.    

Dick uses the “I Ching” or “Book of Changes” extensively as an oracle to develop and divine outcomes for his book as well as helping characters within the story to determine their next course of action (Mountfort, 2016). The work is, therefore, clearly based on a cyclical rather than linear notion of time, in that archetypes of key, formative events or situations are seen to repeat themselves through recurrent patterns of change. Thus, the view of history and time implicit in the I Ching is not only cyclical but synchronistic (Mountford, 2020). 

Amy Ransom argues that critics discussing alternate history (AH) have often neglected to distinguish among the more conventional forms, which are underpinned by a linear, causal, or “diachronic” view of time, and the more “synchronic” view implicit in the French term for the genre, uchronie. She posits the alternative phrase “postmodern alternate history” (Mountford, 2020). The distinctions between each term requires some understanding of how things change over time. 

REFERENCES  

Clark, J. (2020). Do Parallel Universes Really Exist? Retrieved from https://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths/parallel-universe.htm 

Mountfort, P. (2016). The I Ching and Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle. SF-TH Inc. 

Mountfort, P. (2020). Week 10: The Man in the High Castle, uchronie and the I Ching. PowerPoint Part 1 and 2.